
The Observer view on Syria: we must reach out a hand of friendship to Damascus | Observer editorial
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
4% Positive
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : At this pivotal moment of maximum risk and abiding distrust, international assistance should be led and coordinated by the UN.50% : These include pledges by its leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa - better known by his nom de guerre, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani - to honour Syria's multi-faith tradition, respect minority rights, replace the vile security apparatus and allow UN inspections of suspected chemical weapons sites.
50% : The most useful thing Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, can do at this point, and likewise Britain and the EU, is to extend a wary hand of friendship to the new rulers of Damascus - and tell Israel and Turkey to cease their destabilising, predatory behaviour.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.