The Post endorses Trump for president: Letters to the Editor -- Oct....

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

90% : While many Democratic Party-controlled media outlets are either endorsing Harris or refusing to endorse, your support of Trump is truly important and special.
66% : What a surprise -- your editorial staff endorsed Trump for president.
53% : In the runup to the 2016 election, many on the left smugly declared they'd leave the country if Trump won.
37% : Where else can a right-wing newspaper support a second-generation Mussolini and his plans to increase the budget deficit by $7.5 trillion while prosecuting political rivals? Have we become a banana republic, one that treats females akin to cavemen? Kudos to the intrepid Post for endorsing Trump.
37% : What has changed about him now when, before, The Post stated he should never hold that office again? I disagree with The Post's endorsement of Trump, but I respect your right to endorse the candidate you believe should be president.
36% : It's funny how you now warmly endorse Trump for president when, during the primaries, you had nothing good to say about him.
35% : Trump would accomplish none of his supposed domestic goals unless he could act unilaterally, without congressional approval.
32% : Trump is a man who will do anything and say anything to get what he wants, regardless of legality, a man who lies with every waking breath.
32% : The Post's endorsement of Trump could not bring itself to acknowledge the elephant in the room.
30% : The reason: He's afraid of antagonizing Trump.
25% : Even a glimpse of the Jan. 6 Committee hearings in Congress was enough to confirm what was already clear during the Capitol attack: Trump encouraged many people in many different ways to take illegal action to grant him the presidency, knowing it was wrong.
4% : This endorsement recognizes Trump's significance, while the front-page headline quotes Holocaust survivor Jerry Wartski -- and is a stirring response to Vice President Kamala Harris' claim that Trump is a fascist and comparable to Hitler.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.