Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
Slate Magazine Article Rating

The Stakes in These Two States' Judicial Elections Could Not Be Higher

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    70% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    -8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

33% Positive

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : While the court heard Kaul with its current members and will likely issue a decision before a new justice is seated, the new justice would almost certainly be on the bench in time to participate in Planned Parenthood.
51% : If the court rules that the law does limit abortion access, a case brought by Planned Parenthood asks the court to hold that the Wisconsin Constitution protects the right to an abortion.
50% : Wisconsin and Pennsylvania have already held elections in the post-Dobbs era of supercharged state judicial politics.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link