
The UK has spoken out against the 'monstrous' human catastrophe in Gaza. Why won't Australia do more? | Donald Rothwell
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-17% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Australia joined with 22 other states and EU representatives making clear: "Food, medicines and essential supplies are exhausted.50% : It was bluntly stated: "We have two straightforward messages for the Government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity.
50% : Australia, as a friend of Israel and supporter of international law and the rules-based international system, needs to make its position on these issues crystal clear - directly in Canberra and in Jerusalem.
49% : At the conclusion of his Middle East diplomatic and trade tour last week, Trump commented on 16 May: "We're looking at Gaza.
44% : On Wednesday, Australia's foreign minister, Penny Wong, released a statement labelling UN reports on the risks to babies and children "horrifying".
42% : It would appear clear that the international diplomatic and political pressure on Israel had reached a point that it could no longer be ignored.
17% : The images of people in Gaza pleading for whatever food they could secure eventually became too much even for Donald Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.