Atlantic Council Article RatingThe US is right to be concerned about China's influence over the Panama Canal
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
54% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-13% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : The incoming president's remarks likely represent a calculated two-level game strategy: Internationally, Trump is looking to tackle rising canal transit fees while countering China's expanding influence in the Western Hemisphere.33% : After considerable investment of US blood and treasure, the US-built canal remains a remarkable engineering achievement and a critical artery of global trade.
29% : On Tuesday, Trump deliberately refused to rule out the use of military force, preserving maximum leverage in what has so far been a one-sided negotiation.
21% : Why is Trump focused on these issues now?
9% : Trump's claim that the Panama Canal Treaties were a "bad part" of the Carter legacy is a simplification of the nuanced legal and geopolitical complexities surrounding the Panama Canal.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
