
The Guardian view on Iran and Saudi Arabia: a cautious start | Editorial
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-65% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : For Iran, the benefits are obvious: a first step out of political and economic isolation.60% : It enjoys a long partnership with Tehran, but is also Riyadh's biggest trading partner.
59% : It reportedly plans to host a major summit for Iran and Gulf monarchies this year.
48% : He was describing Iran and Saudi Arabia's agreement last week to resume diplomatic relations - a surprise to most observers, and something of a coup for China, which brokered it.
43% : Talks between Riyadh and Tehran had been taking place since at least 2021.
43% : In truth, Iran and Oman laid the groundwork, and China has brought willing parties together, rather than having to bang heads.
16% : In contrast, US dealings with Iran have been worse than ever since the Trump administration withdrew from the JCPoA nuclear deal.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.