
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Is A War Of Values
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
16% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : In 1947, the United Nations proposed the partition plan as the solution to the Israeli-Arab conflict.40% : These explanations focus on issues unique to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the disagreement over the specific land between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea; the more than a millennia of violence between Jews and Muslims that's spanned the globe from Iran to Spain, having nothing to do with land; or the battle of control between Zionists and Arabs.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.