The Rwanda plan is dead in the real world, but will live on in the fantasyland of Tory politics

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : It is a core principle of international law.
53% : They have stood up for the law, as they should.
52% : It is not, as the law here requires it to be in order to qualify as an appropriate destination, a "safe third country".
44% : The supreme court went out of its way to say it was concerned only with the law and not with politics.
43% : And it is part of UK domestic law already, not only through the Human Rights Act but through at least three pieces of immigration law.
34% : The United Nations and Human Rights Watch are among the organisations that have drawn attention to the human rights and criminal justice violations there.
29% : It has a bad human rights record and a poor asylum record, and the independence of its courts from government is in serious doubt.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.