Thomas wants the Supreme Court to overturn landmark rulings that legalized contraception, same-sex marriage
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
72% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
-56% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : The legal reasoning in all three monumental decisions -- as well in the two decisions, Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, that had prior to Friday established a legal right to abortion care -- relied heavily on the doctrine of substantive due process.48% : Lawrence was a 2003 Supreme Court decision that established the right for consenting adults to engage in same-sex intimacy.
48% : Obergefell was a 2015 Supreme Court decision to established the right for same-sex couples to be married.
39% : He explicitly called to reconsider the right of marriage equality, the right of couples to make their choices on contraception," Biden added.
38% : The Supreme Court must revisit and overrule past landmark decisions that legalized the right to obtain contraception, the right to same-sex intimacy and the right to same-sex marriage, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas wrote Friday.
38% : The Court well explains why, under our substantive due process precedents, the purported right to abortion is not a form of 'liberty' protected by the Due Process Clause.
37% : "I join the opinion of the Court because it correctly holds that there is no constitutional right to abortion.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.