Yahoo News Article RatingTrump 'gave permission' for aide to insult Mandelson after Starmer 'ignored' plea not to appoint Labour peer
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-41% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-30% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Donald Trump "gave permission" to his former campaign coordinator to publicly insult Keir Starmer's choice for the UK's new ambassador to the US, an insider has claimed.47% : "Trump gave permission for Chris La Civita to put out that tweet," a source told The Independent.
41% : Since then sources have told The Independent that the Labour government had approached the Trump transition team about the intention to appoint Lord Mandelson, a former spin doctor, cabinet minister and EU commissioner.
20% : Mandelson described Trump as a danger to the world and 'little short of a white nationalist'."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
