Trump Might Have Figured Out How to Trap the Supreme Court

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

35% : Instead, Trump and his people's satanic talent for exploiting his opposition's procedural weakness -- and an instinctive sense for scrambling usual ideological lines -- seemed to flummox the justices, and by the end of the day it was not at all clear what would happen.
30% : As NYU law professor Melissa Murray dryly pointed out, the Court can also drag it out with the best of them, as it did in the criminal cases against Trump, until it ruled he had presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for "official acts.
20% : "When Kavanaugh and Gorsuch say the answer is class actions, I want to bang my head against the wall," said Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck after the argument.
19% : On paper, an oral argument in which not even Samuel Alito wants to argue for the meat of what Trump administration is trying to do, Amy Coney Barrett utters an incredulous Really, and Elena Kagan subjects the solicitor general to a furious line of questioning, followed by Neil Gorsuch saying Kagan asked his questions for him is one that is not going well for the government.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.