
Trump must not leave Israel out of his Middle East deals
- Bias Rating
28% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
58% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-9% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
65% : During his meeting with the new leader of Syria, the first between the countries in 25 years, Trump encouraged interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa to recognize Israel and join the Abraham Accords.64% : Many European parties, like the Democrats in America, are home to pro-terror agitators, while Trump has been regarded as the most reliable friend.
57% : And by the time Trump arrived back in Washington, there were reports that Israel and Syria had indeed started talking about the possibility.
56% : While even some Democrats acknowledged that Trump's energy and sheer force of personality on the world stage were good for America and global stability, Israelis are not wrong to worry that what's good for Trump and the US in the short run might not be good for them.
56% : Yet Trump is not wrong to give a peaceful outcome with Iran a final chance.
52% : The terror group called his release a goodwill gesture to Trump.
51% : Trump is clearly aware of Israel's concern, and in addition to the pitch to Syria, also publicly urged Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords.
49% : When he invited the Supreme Leader in the middle of March to begin negotiations, Trump put a time limit of two months on the talks.
46% : Before that, Trump did not tell Israel he was starting talks with Iran until just days before the first meeting.
46% : But with Trump and his unorthodox ways, these are not ordinary times, and the talks represent a tangible outcome of his trip to the Arab kingdoms of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
40% : Moreover, if Trump removes American sanctions as part of a deal, as he has promised, Iran would have the money to continue funding Hamas, the Houthis and even perhaps a rejuvenated Hezbollah in Lebanon, making another Oct. 7 possible.
37% : The fear is that Trump is falling in love with a kumbaya fantasy about the region that could end up further isolating and endangering the embattled Jewish state.
37% : Netanyahu preferred a joint military action to destroy the known facilities, but Trump, after seeming to agree, decided he wanted to give negotiations another chance.
31% : As Trump made clear in his key speech in Saudi Arabia, he is not a fan of "the so-called nation-builders, neocons or liberal nonprofits like those who spent trillions and trillions of dollars failing to develop Kabul, Baghdad and so many other cities.
30% : What is President Trump up to?
26% : As it was, the sudden news of the America-only cease-fire and the invitation to Iran fueled fears that Trump had cut Israel out of the loop and made a beleaguered Netanyahu look weak at home.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.