Scientific American Article RatingTrump Taps Jared Isaacman, Billionaire and Private Astronaut, to Lead NASA
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-28% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
55% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
42% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
72% : "Jared will drive NASA's mission of discovery and inspiration, paving the way for groundbreaking achievements in Space science, technology, and exploration," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.55% : But in space circles he is more well-known for his leadership of Polaris, a private human orbital spaceflight program reliant on rockets, spacecraft and spacesuits from Elon Musk's SpaceX. Musk, whom Trump has selected alongside entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to co-lead a new, federal-budget-slashing "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), is a close associate of Isaacman's, and Shift4 has extensive financial ties to SpaceX.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
