Bizpac Review Article RatingTrump to end temporary protection status of Somali nationals in Minnesota: 'This is how we win'
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
32% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-19% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : Somalians in Minnesota inflated their autism rates to get more Medicaid funding which was then funneled to al-Qa'ida affiliate al-Shabaab, who are responsible for the most U.S. deaths than any other terror affiliate?44% : Hundreds of THOUSANDS of them have taken over Minnesota, and have stolen hundreds of MILLIONS in U.S. tax dollars, funneling money to terrorist groups Al Shabaab back in Somalia.
36% : " Rufo and Thorpe published their findings with City Journal after uncovering alleged fraud involving Minnesota's Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services and the Feeding Our Future program, which, in part, were said to have inflated autism rates among children to obtain allocated taxpayer funds, which were then sent back to Somalia, seemingly to the benefit of the ISIS-affiliated Al-Shabaab.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
