Trump won't kill green energy

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

68% : Global investment in green energy surpassed that in fossil fuels for the first time in 2016, according to the International Energy Agency.
60% : Research firm Rystad Energy foresees some diversion of green energy investment to fossil fuels under Trump.
58% : The good news is that carbon emissions in the United States are now declining, and they may be close to peaking worldwide and in China as well.
51% : "What type of manufacturing does the US want to onshore -- trailing edge or leading edge?" Trump will probably make a show of eviscerating Biden's climate plans while rebranding some of them as his own.
49% : But markets have a say, and there's an opportunity for businesses to influence Trump during the next four years instead of the other way around.
46% : The additional barrels Trump wants to drill would mean lower prices and smaller profits.
37% : "If Trump were to pull the US out of [of Paris], it would probably be more symbolic than decisive," climate economist Hamad Hussain of Capital Economics said during a recent webinar.
36% : While Trump may have influence over US policy, he won't be able to stop the surge in Chinese EV sales.
36% : Don't expect him to admit it, but Trump may soon discover that the real lunacy would be trying to stop a business boom that's going to happen one way or another.
30% : Trump has bashed EVs, calling Biden's push for electrification "lunacy."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.