
Tuesday briefing: What new plans to curb pro-Palestine Action demonstrations mean for our right to protest
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-51% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Each week, I'd spend a few minutes reading the list back in an attempt to lodge the word into my memory.56% : The changes are supposed to reference and respond to the real anxiety felt by many British Jews as a result of the antisemitism that can sometimes infect anti-Israel movements.
48% : She has just announced a fresh tranche of anti-protest policies that would allow police to re-route, and potentially shut down protests which repeatedly take place in the same area because of their cumulative impact.
48% : To answer those questions, I spoke to Dr Richard Martin, an expert in the policing of protest at the London School of Economics.
46% : He thinks that it is the shared tactic of these two groups - which he defined as "a campaign of attrition where you keep protesting to effectively exhaust the police, to fill the custody suites" - that the government legislation is actually targeted at.
45% : The first, he explained, is that it seems Labour won't use the same low threshold of "more than minor" disruption that was ruled unlawful by the courts; and secondly, they won't try to slip the change in through regulations, but instead by amending the 1986 act - which will include greater parliamentary involvement and scrutiny, but also, makes it harder to subsequently amend.
45% : A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad "As a child I devoured books until my eyes blurred," says the Guardian's Emma Loffhagen.
42% : In recent years, protesters have sought to justify their actions in court with a defence that they had a "reasonable" or "lawful" excuse if they had broken the law, in effect, requiring the prosecution to justify why a conviction outweighs the right to peaceful protest.
31% : In 2014, a backbench Labour MP named Shabana Mahmood lay on the floor of her local Sainsbury's in protest against the sale of products made in illegal Israeli settlements.
27% : The changes to the law would allow police officers to consider the cumulative impact of protest when deciding whether or not they are lawful, meaning they could potentially re-route or totally shut down protest they believe could cause serious disruption to local communities.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.