
Walz Has Experience on a Debate Stage Pinning Down an Abortion Opponent's Shifting Positions
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
1% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : While Trump praised Walz at the time, Republicans now say Walz should have moved faster to use the National Guard.47% : "That's what Trump has said, and they need to make that very clear.
41% : Vance himself had strongly opposed abortion in the runup to his 2022 senatorial election but aligned himself this year with Trump.
25% : " Vance and Trump are treading carefully after their previous support for limiting access to abortion, saying they now want to leave it to the states.
15% : Trump repeatedly declined to say during his Sept. 10 debate with Vice President Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban, insisting that a ban would not pass Congress anyway.
5% : Harris and Walz have been urging their audiences not to trust Trump and Vance on abortion rights.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.