
'We know what is happening, we cannot walk away': how the Guardian bore witness to horror in former Yugoslavia
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-56% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-18% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : "Safe havens" protected by UN forces were finally established in the spring of 1993, initially around Srebrenica.49% : We would put many thousands more troops, wearing UN berets, into Bosnia; and we would allow them not merely to defend themselves, but to make the havens truly safe and Sarajevo a protected city.
32% : On one occasion, after a political story had been displaced to accommodate another startling dispatch from Bosnia, it was denounced as "political pornography" by Gott, the paper's literary editor, at a lively morning meeting.
30% : "'Fuck the UN', was all he said.
26% : Procrastination on the part of the United Nations, failure to agree a course of action among the members of Nato, allowed the terrible toll to continue.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.