
WEDNESDAY AM - Vice president debate fact check: Springfield, Project 2025, Amber Thurman - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-33% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : In August 2020, the last comparable month from when Trump was in office, Border Patrol recorded 47,283 encounters at the border.32% : Trump himself has ruled out supporting birth control restrictions.
28% : Trump touted unproven reports that Haitian migrants had stolen and eaten neighborhood pets, prompting a rebuke from the debate moderators, a slew of fact-checks, and a viral musical remix of his claim.
24% : As president, Trump tried to end TPS designations for a number of migrant groups, including Haitians.
7% : In fact, Trump has arguably gone further than the Harris-Walz ticket on supporting IVF, proposing a universal coverage mandate for IVF treatments/ Trump has disavowed Project 2025 and had no role in writing it.
6% : But overall, illegal immigration has been substantially higher under Biden and Harris than under Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.