Washington Examiner Article RatingWhat the Florida and Wisconsin elections mean - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-14% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
26% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Trump, of course, is in a unique position.56% : But perhaps Musk should have considered that the 2024 success had more to do with Donald Trump than with Elon Musk.
51% : But what about districts Trump won by 10 points?
50% : He had a lot of success campaigning for Trump in 2024.
45% : Democrats will concede that, no, they didn't pick up districts Trump won by 30 points.
43% : Abortion remained a huge part of the campaign until the end, and it's entirely possible Crawford would have won had that been the only issue.
39% : The race became so focused on the Trump-supporting billionaire that Democrats could credibly argue it was a referendum on Musk, on the Department of Government Efficiency, and on Trump.
38% : On the other hand, Trump has almost no seats to lose, given the GOP's super narrow margin in the House.
34% : Here is the beginning of one pro-Crawford ad: "Attacking Social Security.
26% : Musk cannot transfer that political mojo to other races that do not feature Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
