What were Charlie Kirk's most controversial statements?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-20% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
7% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
39% : Kirk shifted the discussion of mass shootings to "mental health" or greater cultural deterioration and frequently dismissed calls for gun regulation.39% : The right-wing activist made a post in March 2020, during the peak of the Covid-19 outbreak, referring to Covid as the "China virus" -- a nickname that President Trump later used during his first term.
37% : Gun control was among the highly controversial political and social issues he discussed at events and on podcasts.
35% : He often made headlines debating issues like gun control, climate change, faith, family values and transgender identity.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
