MSNBCWhat to know about Trump's new RICO lawyer, Steven Sadow
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-24% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
-20% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Sadow, much like Findling, has experience arguing that public statements made by YSL artists -- namely, song lyrics that allegedly refer to crimes they committed -- are protected by the First Amendment and inadmissible in a case prosecuted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.41% : If the argument sounds similar, it bears a resemblance to one that Trump and his associates have made: In essence, that Trump's pressure campaign to overturn Georgia's results in the 2020 presidential election constituted speech that is protected by the First Amendment.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
