When will California see the money Prop 35 promised?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-14% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
20% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Health care industry bigwigs like the California Medical Association and Planned Parenthood wanted to lock the funds away so they could be used for increasing doctor and clinic payments.53% : So while the measure mandated that $90 million should go to reproductive health care or $691 million to primary care, it's up to a 10-person panel to develop a set of recommendations to the Department of Health Care Services for the precise way the money will actually be awarded.
51% : School choice initiative (2026): Kevin McNamee, a former Thousand Oaks mayor and Ventura Community College professor, has revived an initiative that would allow parents to take $17,000 a year in state money currently allocated to public schools and use it for private schools or homeschooling instead.
51% : Amend the state constitution to establish a right to "acquire, own, possess, use, keep and bear firearms" (1984, did not qualify) ...
49% : Amend the state constitution to establish a personal right to "acquire and possess" firearms for defense of self, family and home (2005, did not qualify) ...
45% : Establish constitutional right to keep and bear arms, while specifically excluding licensure for concealed weapons (1989, did not qualify) ...
43% : There's no telling when state regulators will figure it out, and the most optimistic predictions say it will be at least a year before doctors see those raises.
40% : "With federal cuts looming, it is more important than ever that we fight for Medicaid and on behalf of the 15 million Californians who depend on it.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.