Why did Donald Trump free Ross Ulbricht? An idealist libertarian or 'the most dangerous man on the internet'
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-40% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
16% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Standing on stage at the Bitcoin 2024 Conference in Nashville last summer, Donald Trump knew exactly how to get the crowd on his side.58% : This group was made up of libertarians and cryptocurrency holders, who had made Ulbricht into a cause celebre after he was handed a double life sentence plus 40 years for non-violent crimes.
57% : The dark web site was based on the libertarian non-aggression principle, allowing people to buy and sell anything, so long as no third party was harmed.
50% : " On Tuesday - the first full day of his presidency - Trump granted Ulbricht a full and unconditional pardon, allowing him to walk free after more than 11 years of incarceration.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
