
Why Egypt is crying foul over a new megadam on the Nile
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
38% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
13% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : "The cruel irony of Sudan's predicament is that it stands to gain the most practical benefits from GERD-regulated water flows, flood control, reduced sedimentation in its own dams, and potential electricity imports, yet political paralysis and dependency on Egypt prevent it from embracing these advantages," said Memar Ayalew Demeke, an expert in Horn of Africa geopolitics.42% : Studies predict that without mitigation measures, almost 40 per cent of the world's trans-boundary river basins could face conflicts driven by water scarcity in 2041-2050, with hotspots in Africa, southern and central Asia, the Middle East, and North America.
39% : Egypt's bid to stall the GERD included threats to use military force, complaints to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), backdoor diplomacy to get the United States to withhold aid, lobbying the World Bank to stop financing, and appeals to the Arab League.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.