Global Voices Article RatingWhy has the US government put Hong Kong on its human trafficking watchlist?
- Bias Rating
 - Reliability
75% ReliableGood
 - Policy Leaning
10% Center
 - Politician Portrayal
N/A
 
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Conservative
 
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias | 
|---|---|---|
 Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.  | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
 
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : In 2015, the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime designated Hong Kong International Airport as a transit point for human trafficking.34% : A non-member of the Palermo Protocol Since 2017, the United States has included Hong Kong on its human trafficking watchlist, one of the reasons being that Hong Kong has not signed the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (the Palermo Protocol), which was adopted by the UN in 2000, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 