Wikipedia Article on Gaza Genocide Locked by Jimmy Wales Over Alleged Bias

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : Netanyahu and his allies regularly call Israel's military the most moral army in the world.
43% : The situation in Gaza has improved since a ceasefire agreement was reached on Oct. 10, but people in the territory are still struggling immensely, according to the latest status report from the United Nations.
42% : The genocide has been recognised by a United Nations special committee and commission of inquiry, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, multiple human rights groups, numerous genocide studies and international law scholars, and other experts.
40% : More food and emergency personnel have been allowed into Gaza over the past three weeks, but shelter needs are still "largely unmet," according to the UN, with much of the area turned to rubble and severely damaged buildings at risk of collapse.
36% : Olmert has pointed to things like Israel's months-long total blockade of aid getting into Gaza as evidence of war crimes, but stopped short of calling it a genocide.
34% : He went on to say that while he assumed every volunteer editor who worked on the article about the genocide in Gaza was working in good faith, the idea that Israel is committing genocide is "highly contested.
33% : But the people who don't believe it's a genocide fall into more or less two camps: 1) Those who think Israel's actions since the attacks of Oct. 7, 2023 are just like any other war where casualties are high (about 11% of Gaza's population has been killed or injured, according to NPR) and 2) those who think that Israel is committing war crimes, but that those war crimes don't qualify as genocide.
32% : The opening paragraph of the English-language Wikipedia entry currently reads: The Gaza genocide is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.