Financial Times Article RatingWill going back to basics restore BP's fortunes?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Five years after a decision by Lund and former chief executive Bernard Looney to bet the company's future on renewable energy, BP is more a middle-tier energy company with uncertain prospects, worth just over a third of its rival Shell, and the most obvious takeover target in the sector.53% : One person familiar with the plan notes that the 40 per cent cut in oil production was to be made in parts of BP's portfolio where margins were low -- for example in countries where BP was simply being paid fees to drill oilfields -- and that these would be offset with relatively higher earnings from other fields.
39% : Several former executives agree that climate change continues to pose an existential threat to oil and gas businesses and that staking the business on fossil fuels may prove to be a poor long-term strategy.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
