
Polman: Court read what Constitution clearly says
- Bias Rating
34% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : States have the right to conduct their own elections, and conservatives supposedly believe in state's rights.50% : He wrote that a state's legitimate interest "permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office."Let's see if our highest court can find a way to steer around that.David Frum, the sane conservative commentator, writes: "The U.S. Supreme Court now has the opportunity to offer Republicans an exit from their Trump predicament, in time to let some non-insurrectionist candidate win the Republican nomination and contest the presidency...back to a race where the Biden-Harris ticket faces more or less normal opponents, rather than an ex-president who openly yearns to be a dictator."
48% : However, "We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.
30% : And the most dire predictions - violent street riots if Trump was ever indicted - never came true.
26% : Shortly after the Colorado Supreme Court declared in an explosive ruling that Donald Trump can't appear on the state's 2024 ballot because he's an insurrectionist, one of the former president's flacks fumed in predictable fashion about "George Soros" and "Crooked Joe Biden" and a judicial plot that's "un-American."
20% : Conclusion: "President Trump incited and encouraged the use of violence and lawless action to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power (on Jan. 6).
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.