Previous Troubling Reports

Starting right off from the title this article is incredibly biased and attempts to use sarcasm to conceal this, but is simply making fun of Trump's character rather than using specific evidence of his actions. While it might not be fake news, it most certainly omits all information pertaining to the other side and the author's tone really shows this skewed bias.

It isn't fake news, but it is incredibly biased. The author doesn't use any direct quotes from anyone defending AOC, besides AOC herself. The author's tone and diction also make it clear that she doesn't support AOC.

It isn't fake news, but it is incredibly biased. The author doesn't use any direct quotes from anyone defending AOC, besides AOC herself. The author's tone and diction also make it clear that she doesn't support AOC.

This is not fake news per se, however, this article was extremely agaisnt the republican government. It has a clear biased against the republican governmen, while it is not in particular in favor of the democrats, it has a clear biased against the republicans.

This is not fake news per se, however, this article was extremely agaisnt the republican government. It has a clear biased against the republican governmen, while it is not in particular in favor of the democrats, it has a clear biased against the republicans.

It appears as though Fox News has reported some false statistics on the Palestinian death toll from the operation to rescue Israeli hostages. Additionally, the networks diction and tone indicates some level of disregard for Palestine casualties. The mention of them was a mere afterthought towards the end of the piece, and they insinuated that some could have been terrorists. While this could be true, the operation was done at a refuge camp and likely involved tons of innocent civilians-- far more than what Fox mentioned. Fox News tends to lean conservative according to Biasly, and I have noted a consistent pro-Israel tone from them.

This article is troubling because it is clearly biased toward the woman convicted of violating a federal act. It also works hard to make you feel bad for Mrs. Harlow and as if she is the victim in the matter who has been unduly punished for her actions by mentioning the state of her health and her own personal convictions about why she did what she did. It is unfortunate to see an elderly person go to prison, but she is not the victim the article makes her to be, because she did exactly what she was convicted of.

While the author does quote a Democrat chairwoman, most of the quotes come from Trump. Also, most of these quotes from Trump criticize Biden's border policy while promoting his own, therefore presenting Trump's border policy as positive and Biden's as negative.

This article title was clearly biased, trying to paint Paula Collins in a negative light. However, upon reading the article further there is more clarification as to what she meant when saying that statement. The most troubling aspect of this article, though, was the very end where the author tries to invalidate her candidacy by implying that she rents a room in New York for the sole purpose of running for office.

This article title was clearly biased, trying to paint Paula Collins in a negative light. However, upon reading the article further there is more clarification as to what she meant when saying that statement. The most troubling aspect of this article, though, was the very end where the author tries to invalidate her candidacy by implying that she rents a room in New York for the sole purpose of running for office.

Just by the title alone, we can determine that this is a very liberal piece. This is praising Biden for upholding Democracy while criticizing Trump for undermining it. Trump was described as trashing US elections, while Biden. Trump was accused of meeting with Putin solely as an attempt to score political points, and the whole article portrays Trump in a very negative light

This article misrepresents the statements and reports written by the Boston Children's Hospital co-director of the Center for Gender Surgery. The statements made only discussed the possibility of opening specialized clinics for gender surgery or gender-affirming care as there is a possibility people from states that make this care illegal will travel for it. They attempt to portray him in a way that suggests he is urging adolescents to seek out this care, which is incorrect. The end of the article uses evidence that was incorrect and misrepresented the hospital's services which has previously been used to incite violence against members of the hospital and those who receive care from the hospital.