The Salt Lake Tribune
Bias and Reliability

This news media bias manifests in subtle ways, such as placing greater prominence on Democratic voices or using emotional diction when describing liberal causes, while offering more detached language in conservative contexts. Words like “justice,” “equality,” and “rights” appear more frequently in liberal-oriented reporting, while conservative views are often framed as “pushbacks,” “restrictions,” or “oppositions.”

Policy and Issue Framing

When covering gender rights, The Salt Lake Tribune often references inclusivity and representation, supporting movements for expanded legal protections. This aligns with a Somewhat Left media bias, especially in Utah, where local culture tends to be more conservative. Similarly, coverage of environmental issues reflects an urgency consistent with climate advocacy narratives, often featuring voices from scientists, community leaders, and activists in favor of green legislation.

In contrast, issues like gun rights, border security, or religious liberties — typically associated with conservative platforms — are covered in a more cautious or critical tone. These stories are often contextualized through the lens of their impact on marginalized groups or framed as polarizing.

Even in neutral coverage, phrasing choices shape perception. Articles will describe liberal proposals as “expanding access” or “strengthening protections,” while conservative legislation may be described as “imposing limits” or “rolling back rights.” This consistent choice of words reflects an editorial direction that, even unintentionally, can contribute to bias in news media.

Coverage and Relevance

The Salt Lake Tribune’s reporting often touches on key issues central to the media political bias discussion — including newspaper bias, bias in journalism, and biased media narratives. As such, it serves as a compelling case study for examining source bias and news media bias in state-focused reporting.

Readers who wish to further explore how The Salt Lake Tribune compares with other publications can visit Biasly’s Media Bias Chart to analyze tone and word choice in real time.

As a leading local media outlet in Utah, The Salt Lake Tribune plays a significant role in shaping public perception. Readers’ trust in the accuracy of local news may mirror the conclusions reached by Biasly’s media bias ratings. This article delves into The Salt Lake Tribune’s editorial tendencies to explore whether political bias is present and, if so, to what degree.

Is The Salt Lake Tribune Biased?

Based on Biasly’s evaluations, The Salt Lake Tribune is rated as Somewhat Left.

By examining content patterns and the broader context of media influence, we aim to offer a balanced perspective on The Salt Lake Tribune’s political bias—and contribute to the ongoing discussion about bias in the news.

How Does Biasly Rate News Sources?

Biasly uses proprietary algorithms and a team of analysts to provide comprehensive bias evaluations across thousands of news outlets. Over 200,000 articles from more than 3,200 sources have been analyzed to identify the most accurate and unbiased stories.

Biasly assigns each outlet three key scores:

• Reliability Score – Reflects factual accuracy
• AI Bias Score – Generated via natural language processing
• Analyst Bias Score – Assessed by human political analysts

These scores are based on seven core metrics: Tone, Tendency, Diction, Author Check, Selection/Omission, Expediency Bias, and Accuracy. These elements help analysts and algorithms evaluate the political attitude conveyed by each article.

Biasly’s Bias Meter ranges from -100% (most left) to +100% (most right), with 0% indicating neutrality. The system evaluates individual articles based on political terms, policies, figures, and sentiment to calculate precise bias ratings.

Is The Salt Lake Tribune Politically Biased?

The Salt Lake Tribune earns a Somewhat Left rating for its AI Bias Score and a Somewhat Left for its Analyst Bias Score. The Analyst Bias Score is generated by reviewers from liberal, moderate, and conservative backgrounds. Analysts reviewed 15 The Salt Lake Tribune articles and noted preferences in areas like coverage of liberal politicians and policy topics such as abortion rights and clean energy. However, the paper maintained objectivity on topics like education and national security.

For example, coverage of racial minorities and affirmative action laws reflects a mostly neutral tone, but articles involving Black Lives Matter contributed significantly to the liberal score, with a Somewhat Liberal bias.

A The Salt Lake Tribune writer noted in a report:

“We’ve started doing an annual source audit, in which writers count the folks we speak to for our stories and see if they, overall, represent Utah, demographically and economically. And that mentality has been reflected in our staff’s journalism.”

Utah’s demography presents a contrasting backdrop. Pew Research shows that 63% of Utah’s population identifies as Christian, with 50% of them being members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons). Studies show that Mormons are the most strongly affiliated group with the Republican Party.

This means Utah leans more conservative, which could explain differing perceptions of The Salt Lake Tribune’s content. The paper may draw mixed reactions depending on readers’ political orientations.

This Bias score is determined through natural language processing that evaluates the tone, word choice, and opinion embedded in the reporting. Recent AI evaluations highlight liberal-leaning narratives in articles discussing the Republican Party and LGBTQ+ issues.

Analysis of Bias in The Salt Lake Tribune Online Articles

The Salt Lake Tribune has found that in-depth coverage of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is one of the most effective ways to drive subscriptions. Given that much of its readership is Utah-based—where regional issues take precedence—it’s essential to ask: is The Salt Lake Tribune truly biased?

To evaluate this, we can analyze select The Salt Lake Tribune articles through several of Biasly’s bias rating criteria: Tone, Tendency, Author, Diction, and Expediency Bias.

• Tone: The overall attitude conveyed by the article
• Diction: Specific word choices made by the writer
• Author: The background and social presence of the journalist
• Tendency: Patterns of bias in the writer’s broader body of work
• Expediency Bias: Quick visual or textual indicators like headlines and photos that imply bias

Source: The Salt Lake Tribune

One such article features a headline that draws a correlation between religious leader Russell Nelson and Vice President Kamala Harris. Two photos are placed side by side, supported by a third-party source noting their shared values. The article begins on a positive note, emphasizing their shared commitment to supporting marginalized communities—a message likely to resonate with both Mormon and liberal audiences.

Reporter Tamarra Kemsley outlines their respective work in social justice. For instance, Russell Nelson’s collaboration with Reverend Amos Brown of the NAACP is highlighted. Brown, a civil rights leader and an early confidant of Harris, is quoted extensively. While this lends weight to the article, it also reveals Brown’s personal admiration for both figures, raising questions about objectivity.

“The way Brown sees it, both Nelson and Harris are “followers of Jesus of Nazareth,” who, he told The Salt Lake Tribune on Monday, in their own ways and spheres of influence, are helping to improve life for the downtrodden. In doing so, he said, they are busy enacting the “beloved society” described by one of his personal mentors, Martin Luther King Jr.”

The article leans progressive in its portrayal of Harris and Nelson as advocates for the marginalized, reflecting social justice values. By linking Brown’s admiration to Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision of a “beloved society,” the author aligns the narrative with left-leaning ideals, emphasizing moral leadership and advocacy. This framing, while uplifting, subtly situates the subjects within a progressive ideological lens, further underscoring the article’s ideological slant.

Another The Salt Lake Tribune article focuses on Brown’s partnership with the Mormon Church to redress historical racial injustices. Initiatives involving reparations, land access, healthcare, and education—typically championed by liberal platforms—feature prominently.

The article’s portrayal may suggest a Democratic–LDS Church alliance, but the evidence is mostly circumstantial. Some reader comments express skepticism:

“Really Trib, you had to work this hard to find some connection between the presidential race and Mormons…I hope Brown’s endorsement makes it easier for fellow members to support and vote for Kamala.”

The author’s opinion, the lack of alternative perspectives, and social media advocacy suggest a slight lean, though Kemsley generally maintains journalistic boundaries in her religion-focused coverage.

On the other hand, another article titled “Civil rights advocate challenges GOP lawmaker in race for Utah’s House District 26 seat” is far more balanced. It lays out the candidates’ positions without editorializing. Phrases and diction like “policy platform,” “legislative record,” and “constituent concerns” reinforce neutrality. Hot-button issues like abortion are presented factually, without spin:

“Would you support a state constitutional amendment to ban abortion?”
“MacPherson: Yes.”
“Williams: No.”

The article employs diction and language that are notably restrained and formal, contributing to its overall neutral tone. Terms like “challenges” and “advocate” are informative but measured, conveying the dynamics of the race without implying aggression or favoritism. The author also avoids emotionally charged words or loaded phrases often seen in more partisan outlets. Instead of framing the contest as a “battle” or “clash,” she refers to it as a “race” or “campaign,” maintaining an even-handed tone.

The reporter, Shannon Sollit, avoids emotional or judgmental language, letting the facts speak for themselves. While her social media presence leans slightly liberal, her writing remains professional and neutral in tone.  Here is an example of left-leaning sway used on Shannon Sollit Twitter profile:

Sam Conder expected the huge, standalone steel structures he and his family built to hold trail signs and land markers on BLM land across Utah. He also expected to be paid for the work.
Trump’s IRA funding freeze now means he won’t be. https://t.co/Lb3XCoiaud

— Shannon Sollitt (@ShannonSollitt) February 26, 2025

In summary, The Salt Lake Tribune shows inconsistent bias in its reporting. While Sollit’s House District 26 coverage maintains neutrality through balanced presentation and restrained language, the Nelson-Harris article reveals a progressive slant by framing both figures within a social justice narrative that aligns with left-leaning values. Reliance on a source with personal connections to both subjects further undermines objectivity. Despite attempts at balance in some reporting, The Salt Lake Tribune’s tendency to highlight progressive initiatives and frame stories through a social justice lens indicates an overall left-leaning orientation, particularly when covering the intersection of religious institutions and politics.

Analysis of The Salt Lake Tribune Opinion Articles

To fully understand political bias in media, it’s important to distinguish between factual reporting and opinion pieces. While reporting aims to present facts and let readers form their own conclusions, opinion articles express personal viewpoints on current issues. Although the previous section examined factual reporting, this section turns to how bias surfaces through The Salt Lake Tribune’s selection and tone of opinion content.

One prominent example is the op-ed titled “We Must Stand Together for Immigrants, for Education, and for Justice.” The title itself signals a persuasive tone and a clear alignment with progressive values. It implies dissatisfaction with the political status quo—particularly under the Trump administration—and calls for collective action, suggesting that the author prioritizes persuasion over balanced information delivery.

In contrast, another opinion piece titled “Lessons from WWII to Avoid WWIII” employs more centrist language. Its title does not lean toward any political side and frames the issue around a shared desire to maintain peace. The subheading is neutral and avoids emotionally loaded language, suggesting the piece may be less ideologically charged.

These examples show that while not all The Salt Lake Tribune opinion pieces are overtly liberal, the platform frequently publishes content that aligns with liberal media narratives. This consistent selection of opinion pieces can contribute to perceptions of systemic bias—particularly when the editorials predominantly support liberal views or causes.

This tendency underscores the importance of distinguishing subjective viewpoints from straight reporting, especially when interpreting the political leanings of any news organization.

How to Evaluate Bias

Although Biasly rates The Salt Lake Tribune as Somewhat Left, it’s important to remember that bias can vary from article to article. The Salt Lake Tribune also covers a conservative-leaning state with objectivity on many issues, from state legislation to social developments. This complexity underscores the importance of examining each article individually. So, let’s learn how to evaluate media bias.

Recognizing media bias requires awareness and critical thinking. Often, readers trust news sources that affirm their existing beliefs—a psychological tendency known as confirmation bias. This makes it harder to identify slanted narratives or one-sided reporting.

To address this, it’s essential to challenge your assumptions by consulting multiple perspectives and verifying information through third-party analysis. Tools like Biasly’s media bias ratings allow readers to compare the same news story across the political spectrum.

Ultimately, bias isn’t always a matter of what is said—it’s also about what is left out, how topics are framed, and which stories are chosen for coverage. Learning to recognize these patterns can help readers make more informed decisions and develop greater media literacy.

To start comparing news outlets and gain a better understanding of bias, sign up for Biasly’s Media Bias & News Analytics Platform to see how stories vary between sources.

contrast, hallmarks of a reliable source include:

• Absence of subjective language
• Citing credible sources (e.g., .gov, .edu, academic references)
• Verifiable facts and statistics from multiple outlets
• Use of primary sources, like interviews or transcripts
• Consistency with coverage across other platforms

Biasly’s reliability scores incorporate these elements in evaluating media outlets.

So How Does The Salt Lake Tribune Fare in Its Reliability?

The political reliability index developed by Biasly assesses both accuracy and trustworthiness. The Salt Lake Tribune currently holds Average Reliability Score, which is calculated as a weighted average of:

• Fact Analysis Score – Evaluates the accuracy of claims, facts, and evidence.
• Source Analysis Score – Assesses the number, diversity, and credibility of sources and quotes used.

The Salt Lake Tribune’s Source Analysis Score is Average at 49% Reliable. This suggests moderate trustworthiness in its sourcing practices. The score is AI-generated and considers quote length, frequency, diversity, and quality.

The Fact Analysis Score of The Salt Lake Tribune is Pending at N/A. This further shows how well The Salt Lake Tribune supports its claims, addresses selection and omission bias, and presents verifiable evidence.

While The Salt Lake Tribune leans toward factual reporting, occasional lapses—such as unbalanced viewpoints or incomplete data—can affect its reliability rating. These nuances emphasize the importance of analyzing individual articles.

The Salt Lake Tribune’s Accuracy and Reliability

According to Biasly’s analysis, The Salt Lake Tribune maintains Average Reliability Score, but individual articles may vary significantly. Let’s dive into the details.

Political orientation plays a crucial role in how audiences perceive reliability. The Salt Lake Tribune has been accused of favoring a liberal narrative, potentially at the expense of factual reporting. To validate such claims, it’s essential to analyze whether the publication backs its assertions with sufficient evidence and diverse viewpoints.

Two common types of bias that affect factuality include:

• Selection Bias – Highlighting or omitting stories to fit a particular narrative.
• Omission Bias – Leaving out differing perspectives or relevant details to skew perception.

Biasly’s accuracy ratings use a scale from 1% (least accurate) to 100% (most accurate). Factors include supporting evidence, reliable internal and external sources, and balanced viewpoints.

For instance, Biasly gave the BizPac Review a Somewhat Conservative Bias and an Average Analyst Reliability Score. One BizPac article, titled “Chris Cillizza says corporate media was ‘too willing’ to buy Biden team’s line that he was fit as a fiddle”, showed an Average reliability rating for failing to include diverse viewpoints and for employing inflammatory language. Critical language towards Joe Biden did not stop at the headline, either, and reporter Jason Cohen failed to complement his selection of conservative opinions with views belonging to any other school of thought. In contrast, another piece from the outlet, titled “SCOTUS will hear case that could result in country’s first taxpayer-funded religious charter school” featuring legal and political sources with balanced quotes, was rated as Center and scored high for accuracy. The most significant language opposing liberal views here comes from a politician whose position naturally required involvement in local education systems. Vivex Saxena reported:

“The plan is supported by Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters: The problem is that charter schools are considered public schools by default.”

This quotation is characteristic of Saxena’s writing throughout the article, as her unique variation of sources and more extensive quotes produced Good and Excellent reliability ratings on Biasly.

We will take a closer look at more examples like this below to provide a further investigation into the reliability of The Salt Lake Tribune’s articles. This will include its use of selection bias, omission bias, and the quality of its sources and the facts it uses.

Analysis of Reliability in The Salt Lake Tribune’s Online News Articles

The Salt Lake Tribune aims to serve Utahans with objective, fact-based reporting. Its staff includes writers from varying ideological backgrounds, which can help balance coverage. However, readers should distinguish between news reporting and opinion pieces to evaluate credibility effectively.

One notable example is the article titled “Mike Lee says he wants to stop noncitizen immigrants from voting – but has no evidence they are.” Reporter Bryan Schott covered Senator Mike Lee’s claims, citing past debates and legal records. The article refrains from editorial commentary, sticking to quotes and fact-based language. Despite The Salt Lake Tribune’s Somewhat Left rating, this piece illustrates factual neutrality.

Quality of Sources and Facts Used

The Salt Lake Tribune often uses credible sources from across the political spectrum. However, some articles lean too heavily toward how comprehensively they present opposing viewpoints.

Consider the headline: “Utah transgender bill threatens millions in federal funds for sexual assault, domestic violence services.” While well-documented and supported by nonprofit data and legal references, the article offers no insight into why most Republican Senators supported the bill. This absence creates a perception that the bill is baseless, despite its passage.

But can readers find evidence opposing the claim made in this article? Emily Anderson, The Salt Lake Tribune’s reporter, mentioned Republican Senator Todd Weiler and his reasons for voting against the bill.

“Among the list of reasons he said he did not support it was the threat the bill poses to federal funding for victim services.”

“That segregation of trans people from spaces aligning with their gender identity goes beyond restrooms and locker rooms.”

Concerning the remainder of Republican Senators who voted in favor of the bill, there is no mention of the data or reasoning behind their support. This lack of information leads readers to believe the bill in question had no grounds for passage, despite receiving a majority vote.

In contrast, the article “These Republicans want Mitt Romney’s U.S. Senate seat. Here’s where they stand on Utah’s biggest issues” maintains objectivity. It features multiple Republican Senate candidates and their plaIn contrast, the article “These Republicans want Mitt Romney’s U.S. Senate seat. Here’s where they stand on Utah’s biggest issues.” is structured as a candidate Q&A round-up, where the reporter sets up a consistent set of questions and then largely lets the candidates speak in their own words. The format telegraphs that what follows is an attribution-and-comparison exercise (what each candidate says on abortion, immigration, water, foreign aid, the 2020 election, etc.), rather than an argument-driven narrative, so the key “evidence” in the piece is the candidates’ verbatim responses and how evenly they’re presented.

The article contains 3 direct quotes in quotation marks (counting partial quotes): “Remain in Mexico” (3 words), “Secure the Border Act of 2023” (7 words), and “COVID” (1 word). The shortest quote is 1 word, the longest is 7 words, and the average quote length is 3.7 words. Because almost all candidate statements are presented as attributed answers without quotation marks, the piece is not quote-driven in the typical “soundbite” sense; instead, it relies on attributed blocks of text. That approach can be more reliable in one way—readers see longer, uninterrupted candidate language with less opportunity for selective snippetting—but it also means we don’t get classic “verbatim” quotation context (tone, emphasis, exact phrasing) except for a few labeled phrases; in general, longer attributed passages (even without quotation marks) reduce the risk of cherry-picked micro-quotes and can feel more transparent about what the speaker meant.

On linked sources, the article uses 2 distinct hyperlinks in the body: one to the author page (Bryan Schott) and one to a prior Tribune story about Trump endorsing Staggs (“nominated by Utah GOP delegates…”). By left/center/right: Left = 0, Center = 2, Right = 0. Both links are internal Salt Lake Tribune pages (a mainstream local news outlet link structure rather than an ideologically varied set of external references), so the “linked-source” footprint is small and doesn’t function as a cross-ideological evidence base; it mainly provides navigation and background within the same publication.

• Bryan Schott, Salt Lake Tribune political reporter/author (Center)
• The Salt Lake Tribune (sltrib.com), news outlet/publisher (Center)
• “Trump endorses Trent Staggs…” (linked Salt Lake Tribune politics article providing background) (Center)
• John Curtis, U.S. Republican Representative and U.S. Senate candidate (Right)
• Trent Staggs, Republican Senate candidate and local elected official (mayor) (Right)
• Jason Walton, Republican Senate candidate and businessman/entrepreneur (Right)
• Brad Wilson, Republican Senate candidate and former Utah House speaker (Right)
• Caroline Gleich, Democratic U.S. Senate candidate (Left)
• Mitt Romney, outgoing U.S. Senator referenced as the seat being replaced (Center/Right-leaning individual in common perception, but not a speaking source here) (Center)
• Susan B. Anthony List, anti-abortion advocacy organization referenced by Curtis (Right)
• S. Supreme Court (Dobbs decision referenced) (Center/Institutional)
• Roe v. Wade, referenced Supreme Court precedent (Center/Institutional reference)
• Colorado River Compact / interstate compacts (policy/legal framework referenced) (Center/Institutional reference)
• Utah Colorado River Authority, state entity referenced (Center/Institutional)
• S. Congress / House Resolution 2 (“Secure the Border Act of 2023”) referenced (Center/Institutional)
• S. Department of Education, federal agency discussed (Center/Institutional)
• “Inflation Reduction Act,” federal law referenced (Center/Institutional)
• “Green New Deal,” political reference used by a candidate (Left as a referenced idea, not a sourced voice)
• Mike Lee, U.S. Senator whose claim is referenced in a question (Right)
• Joe Biden, President referenced repeatedly by candidates (Left)
• Vladimir Putin, referenced in Ukraine discussion (not a sourced voice) (N/A)
• Hamas, referenced in Israel discussion (not a sourced voice) (N/A)
• Trent Nelson, Salt Lake Tribune photographer credited in captions (Center)
• Rick Egan, Salt Lake Tribune photographer credited in captions (Center)

The sourcing is lopsided by design in terms of who is allowed to speak: it’s overwhelmingly Right voices (the four Republican candidates’ responses dominate nearly all substantive content), with a Left figure (Caroline Gleich) mentioned only as the general-election opponent and not quoted or sourced. In volume and prominence, the Republicans completely dominate because the article is explicitly about the Republican primary; by quoted-word share (in the conventional sense), there are almost no traditional quotes at all, and what “share of voice” exists comes from long attributed answer blocks that are distributed fairly evenly across the four GOP candidates.

In how sources are used, the candidates are presented mostly neutrally—the reporter asks the same questions and runs each candidate’s response with light editing noted for grammar/clarity/length, with minimal fact-checking or evaluative framing inside the piece. Claims like election-related allegations or immigration assertions are not heavily challenged within the text, which can function as a form of neutrality (letting readers judge) but can also inadvertently advantage the speaker making the strongest or most dubious claim by giving it uncorrected space. Grounded in what we can count here (speaker access and framing, not external-link diversity), the author’s operating bias reads closest to Center: the structure is standardized and comparative rather than argumentative, but it’s not “balanced” left/right in speaker representation because the assignment is specifically to profile a GOP primary.

On factual accuracy, the broad context is generally consistent with public, widely known facts: Mitt Romney was retiring; Utah’s GOP field included Curtis, Staggs, Walton, and Wilson; Dobbs overturned Roe; the Colorado River faces long-term supply stress; and Biden won the 2020 election. Where accuracy becomes harder is inside candidate claims presented without verification—e.g., assertions about noncitizen voting, “blank check” figures for Ukraine funding, or characterizations of Biden immigration policy—some of which are commonly disputed or require careful qualifiers and sourcing to evaluate.

Selection and Omission Bias

The Salt Lake Tribune provides extensive coverage of Utah’s Republican leaders, which is reasonable given the state’s political makeup. However, bias may still emerge through framing and story selection.

In “Facing threats from GOP election doubters, would Utah’s L.G. endorse Trump?”, selection bias surfaces through the article’s emphasis on negative aspects of Republican discourse. The article does not explore positive initiatives led by Utah’s GOP, nor does it present contrasting viewpoints. Still, it remains rooted in verifiable quotes.

The article does not highlight any proactive or positive measures taken by GOP leaders in Utah (such as improvements to election security, bipartisan outreach, or public education efforts around voting). Therefore, the article leans slightly left in its framing. The author addresses threats and misinformation as largely a GOP-internal problem, without exploring broader or contrasting perspectives. That said, the reporting does not cross into overt editorializing and is, for the most part, grounded in verifiable facts and quotes.

By comparison, the article about Senator Mike Lee shows a stronger balance. Reporter Bryan Schott includes quotes from officials across the political spectrum and references documentation available for public review. A notable example of left-leaning bias comes from a source quote:

“Former Utah County Clerk Josh Daniels, who now leads the nonprofit group Trust Utah Elections, says claims that noncitizens are flocking to America to cast a ballot are nothing more than cynical fearmongering.”

Schott uses a wide range of sources that together present diverse opinions. The article integrated conversations from conservative platforms and included responses from politicians at both the federal and state levels. He also cited legal documentation readily available to the public for cross-examination and further analysis, which stands out as particularly objective fact reporting. Overall, Schott used a well-rounded approach to delivering unbiased news to readers of The Salt Lake Tribune.

In opinion pieces, issues with factuality, sourcing, selection, and omission are common. The articles we’ve covered so far reflect The Salt Lake Tribune’s Somewhat Left views, but this is not detrimental to its reliability. Its story selection favors issues more likely to concern liberals, suggesting it neglects issues in Utah that concern conservatives. However, the contents of The Salt Lake Tribune’s article maintain accuracy and tend to cite evidence from numerous and varied sources.

So, Is The Salt Lake Tribune Reliable?

Overall, The Salt Lake Tribune can be considered to be an outlet that is moderately reliable. It demonstrates a consistent goal of journalistic integrity and typically supports claims with sources and quotes. Occasional omissions and framing bias do appear, particularly on culturally sensitive or partisan issues.

As media literacy improves, readers can more easily detect issues with selection bias, omission bias, and factuality. To strengthen your ability to assess reliability across the political spectrum, use Biasly’s News Bias Checker to compare how multiple outlets report the same story.

This empowers you to consume more accurate, balanced, and dependable news

Paul Huntsman played a pivotal role in the Tribune’s transition to nonprofit status after removing it from hedge fund ownership. This transformation helped the paper earn its second Pulitzer Prize in 2017, signaling a renewed editorial independence.

Source: The Salt Lake Tribune

Under its nonprofit structure, the newspaper’s editorial board operates independently of its newsroom and is no longer permitted to endorse political candidates. Moreover, The Tribune’s gift policy asserts:

“No. While we will seek financial support for reporting and special projects, no donor or gift directs or influences the organization’s reporting on issues, people or organizations.”

This reinforces the paper’s public commitment to transparency in journalism, helping ensure that financial contributions do not bias editorial content. While some biases may still arise due to staff perspectives or editorial practices, they are not easily attributed to external funding.

This nonprofit approach may provide added reassurance to readers seeking a news outlet that values independence and editorial integrity.

Who Funds The Salt Lake Tribune?

The Salt Lake Tribune is owned and operated by The Salt Lake Tribune, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization governed by a local board of directors. The outlet converted from a for-profit company to nonprofit status in 2019 after receiving IRS approval, allowing it to accept tax-deductible donations alongside subscriptions and advertising revenue. 

Today, it solicits reader contributions and philanthropic support through its membership portal and publishes legal/financial documents on its site for transparency. Its funding now comes primarily from reader memberships, philanthropic foundations, corporate sponsorships, and advertising sales. Reporting on The Salt Lake Tribune’s transition notes a donor-supported model and efforts to build long-term sustainability (including endowment fundraising via the Utah Journalism Foundation), which can diversify revenue but also raises the general risk, common to nonprofit media, of donor influence on coverage if guardrails are weak. 

In practice, The Salt Lake Tribune states governance and disclosure measures (e.g., posting IRS 1023/501(c)(3) documents) intended to mitigate such risks; nevertheless, as with any outlet, funding sources and board priorities can shape newsroom incentives over time and should be monitored by readers.

Other contributors focus on religion, environment, or civil rights—topics central to Utah communities. While some contributors may be seen as leaning left in tone or topic selection, their work is generally grounded in factual reporting. The presence of recurring bylines helps readers evaluate individual journalists’ bias over time.

Related Tools and Resource Pages

To better understand how The Salt Lake Tribune fits into the broader media landscape, we recommend exploring these helpful resources:

• Media Bias Chart: See where The Salt Lake Tribune ranks among hundreds of media outlets across the political spectrum.
• Political Bias Chart: Visualize political slants of news sources across various policy areas.
• Journalist Bias Analytics Platform: Explore how individual journalists contribute to bias within their publications.
• Politician Bias Analytics Platform: Compare how politicians are framed differently by The Salt Lake Tribune and other outlets.
• Media Literacy Education Platform: Learn how to critically assess media sources, bias techniques, and news reliability.