The Siasat Daily
Bias and Reliability

This news media bias manifests in subtle ways regarding most topics, such as painting Democratic voices in a slightly more positive light when discussing US politics. The author may use emotional diction when describing liberal causes, such as the critique of growing Muslim persecution in India. At the same time, they may offer more detached language in most conservative contexts. Words like “anti-discrimination,” “equality,” and “rights” appear more frequently in liberal-oriented reporting, while conservative views are sometimes framed as “pushbacks,” “failures to pass,” or “oppositions.” Though The Siasat Daily maintains a neutral stance on many international issues.

Policy and Issue Framing

On gender equity, The Siasat Daily challenges cultural assumptions about male superiority and cites barriers to reaching global parity by 2030, positions consistent with a mild left-leaning frame in the Indian context. Environmental coverage often conveys urgency (e.g., “negative impact of global warming,” “save our earth”).

Conversely, coverage of policies commonly associated with conservative platforms (e.g., U.S. tariffs) may be contextualized by costs to trading partners or described as polarizing. While reporting is generally fact-based, repeated phrasing choices can cumulatively signal editorial leaning.

Even in neutral coverage, phrasing choices shape perception. Articles describe liberal proposals as “established” or “applied,” while conservative legislation may be described as “failed to pass.” This consistent choice of words reflects an editorial direction that, even subconsciously, can definitely contribute to bias in news media.

Coverage and Relevance

The Siasat Daily’s reporting often touches on key issues central to the media political bias discussion. A key issue is between the Muslim minority and Hindu nationalists in India. As such, it serves as a compelling case study for examining source bias and news media bias in country-focused or world-focused reporting.

Readers who wish to further explore how The Siasat Daily compares with other publications can visit Biasly’s Media Bias Chart to analyze tone and word choice in real time.

Is The Siasat Daily Biased?

Based on Biasly’s evaluations, The Siasat Daily is rated as Somewhat Left.

By examining content patterns and the broader context of media influence, we aim to offer a balanced perspective on The Siasat Daily’s political bias—and contribute to the ongoing discussion about bias in the news.

How Does Biasly Rate News Sources?

Biasly uses proprietary algorithms and a team of analysts to provide comprehensive bias evaluations across thousands of news outlets. Over 200,000 articles from more than 3,200 sources have been analyzed to identify the most accurate and unbiased stories.

Biasly assigns each outlet three key scores:

• Reliability Score – Reflects factual accuracy
• AI Bias Score – Generated via natural language processing
• Analyst Bias Score – Assessed by human political analysts

These scores are based on seven core metrics: Tone, Tendency, Diction, Author Check, Selection/Omission, Expediency Bias, and Accuracy. These elements help analysts and algorithms evaluate the political attitude conveyed by each article.

Biasly’s Bias Meter ranges from -100% (most left) to +100% (most right), with 0% indicating neutrality. The system evaluates individual articles based on political terms, policies, figures, and sentiment to calculate precise bias ratings.

Is The Siasat Daily Politically Biased?

The Siasat Daily earns a Somewhat Left rating for its AI Bias Score and a Somewhat Left for its Analyst Bias Score. The Analyst Bias Score is generated by reviewers from liberal, moderate, and conservative backgrounds. Analysts reviewed 15 The Siasat Daily articles and noted slight preferences in coverage of liberal politicians, but many neutral topics too. There was also support for policy topics such as pro Muslim support, gender equality, and the importance of combating global warming, as it is an issue directly affecting India. However, the paper maintained objectivity on topics like LGBTQ+ marriage and the Israeli-Palestinian crisis.

For example, coverage of Switzerland’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage remained neutral. However, articles involving US tariffs contributed to the liberal score because of criticism towards conservative politicians.

As a The Siasat Daily writer noted in a report on the passing of the policy for the LGBTQ+ community:

“Supporters said passage would put same-sex partners on equal legal footing with heterosexual couples by allowing them to adopt children together and facilitating citizenship for same-sex spouses.”

The demography of India, especially religiously, displays a contrasting backdrop to the arguments seen above. Pew Research shows that close to 80% of India’s population identifies as Hindu, with another approximately 15% identifying as Muslim. Studies show that many Hindus align with conservative ideas and support the BJP. The Bharatiya Janata Party is the current ruling political party in India under the prime minister, Narendra Modi. The BJP supports conservative ideals and is a pro-Hindu party. This makes for conservative, often Hindu-favoring, legislation in India.

“India’s religiously diverse population is, therefore, composed of religious communities who are not too familiar with each other’s beliefs and practices, and who don’t see much common ground among them.”

This means India as a whole tends to lean more conservatively, which can explain differing perceptions of The Siasat Daily’s content. The news outlet may draw mixed reactions depending on readers’, specifically those living in India, political and religious orientations.

This Bias score is determined through natural language processing that evaluates the tone, word choice, and opinion, when visible, embedded in the reporting. Recent evaluations highlight left-leaning narratives in articles discussing the conservative BJP party and US Republican issues; however, The Siasat Daily maintains objectivity on many topics.

Analysis of Bias in The Siasat Daily Online Articles

The Siasat Daily has found that balancing coverage of India-centric topics with international news is the most effective way to drive page viewers. Given that much of its readership is India-based—where regional issues take precedence—it’s imperative to ask: is The Siasat Daily truly biased?

To evaluate this, we can analyze select The Siasat Daily articles through several of Biasly’s bias rating criteria: Tone, Tendency, Author, Diction, and Expediency Bias.

• Tone: The overarching attitude conveyed by the article
• Diction: Specific word choices used by the writer
• Author: The background and social presence of the journalist or outlet as a whole
• Tendency: Repeated patterns of bias in the writer’s broader array of work
• Expediency Bias: Quick visual or textual indicators like headlines and photos that imply bias one way or another

Source: The Siasat Daily

This article features a headline announcing Maria Corina Machado’s recent win of the Nobel Peace Prize. Machado championed democratic rights and government for the people of Venezuela under the presidency of Nicólas Maduro. The article has a positive tone in regards to Machado’s award.

The article was republished from the Press Trust of India on The Siasat Daily’s site by P.N. Sree-Harsha. Machado is a member of the ‘opposition’ in Venezuela, meaning she is against the current regime of power in the country. This article about her award may appeal to the left-leaning readers because of her ideas of democracy and fair elections. However, these are statements of Machado from the committee, not opinions from The Siasat Daily of her work.

“The former opposition presidential candidate in Venezuela was lauded for being a “key, unifying figure in a political opposition that was once deeply divided – an opposition that found common ground in the demand for free elections and representative government,” said Jorgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel committee.”

The article leans progressively because of its positive portrayal of Machado’s work in Venezuela. It cites a quote from the award committee, calling it both “key” and “unifying”. By including the social media post from The Nobel Prize, which highlights Machado’s work as helping work towards a transition from dictatorship to democracy, the article connects the award to democratic ideals. This framing, while positive, situates the subject within a progressive liberal lens, further demonstrating this article’s liberal slant.

Another The Siasat Daily article titled, “Putin praises Trump’s peace efforts even after failing to win Nobel prize”, focuses on Vladimir Putin’s praise of President Trump’s peace efforts in the Ukraine conflict and in Gaza. This comes despite Trump not winning the Nobel Peace Prize. While Putin never addresses Maria Corina Machado’s winning of the award, he negatively discusses the committee’s choices for the award. This article falls on the opposite side of the previously discussed article from The Siasat Daily, positively outlining the 2025 award, as this demonstrates a negative outsider viewpoint on the award.

The article’s portrayal may suggest a slight conservative lean based on Putin’s comments, but the evidence is mostly circumstantial:

“The Russian leader didn’t comment on Machado’s win, but he said without mentioning any names that the Nobel Committee in the past has awarded the prize to those who have accomplished little to help global peace…“There have been cases where the committee has awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to people who have done nothing for peace,” Putin said.”

The lack of alternative perspectives and quote choice suggests a slight conservative lean, differing from the article above. Though The Siasat Daily generally does not allow journalistic media bias in their articles to establish boundaries of objective reporting.

On the other hand, another article titled “Three senior Maoist leaders surrender in Telangana” is much more balanced. It states that some leaders of the banned CPI/Maoist party in India turned themselves in after being underground for years. Phrases and diction like “come forward” and “reintegrate into normal public life” reinforce neutrality. Politically charged issues like the discussion of members of the banned party are presented factually, without spin:

“Speaking to the media, the DGP stated that as many as 412 Maoists have rejoined the mainstream of society in recent months. These include people who had held positions at both the state and national committee levels.”

The article uses diction and language that are notably objective and formal, adding to its overall neutral tone. Terms like “urged” and “chose to surrender” are informative but measured, conveying the dynamics of the situation without shaming or implying harsh punishment. The author, Seleha Fatima, avoids emotionally charged words often seen in more partisan outlets when discussing the banned party. Instead of framing the members turning themselves in as a “victory” or “win,” she maintains an even tone. The author avoids biased or judgmental language, letting the facts dictate the article.

To conclude, The Siasat Daily shows inconsistent bias across its reporting. While coverage about banned party members surrendering in India maintains neutrality through balanced presentation and objective language, the first-discussed Machado article reveals a slightly progressive, liberal slant by discussing Machado’s work towards democratic government in Venezuela in a way that aligns with left policy stances. Despite attempts at balance in some reporting, The Siasat Daily’s tendency to highlight liberal initiatives and frame stories through a pro-democracy, progressive lens indicates an overall Somewhat Left positioning, especially when covering world governments and politics.

Analysis of The Siasat Daily Opinion Articles

To fully understand political bias in the media, it’s important to distinguish between factual reporting and opinion pieces. Reporting aims to present facts and standard analysis and let readers form their own personal conclusions. However, opinion articles express personal viewpoints on current or past issues. Though the previous section examined reporting, this section shows how bias surfaces through The Siasat Daily’s selection of opinion articles.

One relevant example is the op-ed titled “Need for an all-Indian Muslim educational movement.” The title itself signals a persuasive tone and a clear alignment with progressive values and pro-Muslim support. It implies dissatisfaction with the educational status quo, specifically in India, and calls for collective action for “all-India”. This suggests the author prioritizes persuasion and personal opinion over factual, non-personal information delivery.

In contrast, another opinion piece titled “Magnitude 5 quake shakes Istanbul, triggers school evacuations” employs more centrist language. Its title does not lean toward any political side and frames the issue around the facts of the earthquake, and does not discuss emotional aspects. The subheading is neutral, stating, “No immediate reports of damage or casualties”, which avoids emotionally loaded phrasing, indicating that the article is solely a factual report of the event.

These examples show that while not all The Siasat Daily opinion pieces are outwardly liberal, the newspaper publishes content somewhat frequently that aligns with liberal media narratives. This consistent choice of opinion pieces contributes to perceptions of systemic bias—particularly when the editorials predominantly highlight liberal views or causes.

This pattern shows the importance of distinguishing subjective viewpoints from straight factual reporting, especially when interpreting the political leanings of any news organization or journalist.

How to Evaluate Bias

Although Biasly rates The Siasat Daily as Somewhat Left, it’s important to remember that bias can vary from article to article. The Siasat Daily also covers a more conservative-leaning country with objectivity on many issues, from world news to domestic legislation. This complexity emphasizes the importance of examining each article individually. So, let’s learn how to evaluate media bias.

Recognizing media bias requires awareness and critical thinking. Often, readers trust news sources that affirm their existing beliefs—a psychological tendency known as confirmation bias. This makes it harder to identify slanted narratives or one-sided reporting.

To combat this, it’s essential to challenge your assumptions by consulting multiple viewpoints and verifying news through third-party analysis. Tools like Biasly’s media bias ratings allow readers to compare the same news story across the political spectrum.

Ultimately, bias isn’t always a matter of what is said—it’s also about what is left out, how topics are framed, and which stories are chosen for coverage. Learning to recognize these patterns can help readers make more informed decisions and develop greater media literacy.

To start comparing news outlets and gain a better understanding of bias, sign up for Biasly’s Media Bias & News Analytics Platform to see how stories vary between sources.

So How Does The Siasat Daily Fare in Its Reliability?

The political reliability index developed by Biasly assesses both accuracy and trustworthiness. The Siasat Daily currently holds Limited Reliability Score, which is calculated as a weighted average of:

• Fact Analysis Score – Evaluates the accuracy of claims, facts, and evidence.
• Source Analysis Score – Assesses the number, diversity, and credibility of sources and quotes used.

The Siasat Daily’s Source Analysis Score is Limited at 29% Reliable. This suggests moderate trustworthiness in its sourcing practices. The score is AI-generated and considers quote length, frequency, diversity, and quality.

The Fact Analysis Score is yet to be finalized. This score will further determine how well The Siasat Daily  supports its claims, addresses selection and omission bias, and presents verifiable evidence. Until this is available, readers are encouraged to perform their own evaluations using Biasly’s media bias tools.

While The Siasat Daily leans toward factual reporting, occasional lapses or personal biases, such as unbalanced viewpoints or incomplete data, can affect its reliability rating. These nuances emphasize the importance of analyzing media bias for individual articles.

The Siasat Daily’s Accuracy and Reliability

According to Biasly’s analysis, The Siasat Daily maintains Limited Reliability Score, but individual articles may vary significantly. Let’s dive into the details.

Political stances play an important role in how readers and audiences view the reliability of a source. The Siasat Daily is generally considered to be Somewhat Left, or relatively objective; however, they sometimes uphold more liberal values, making them occasionally left-leaning. This comes at the expense of fact reporting, where articles can be based on political ideology in place of objectivity. One must analyze the publication’s assertions to find whether there is sufficient evidence and diverse views.

Two common types of bias that affect factuality include:

• Selection Bias – Highlighting or omitting stories to fit a particular narrative.
• Omission Bias – Leaving out differing perspectives or relevant details to skew perception.

Biasly’s accuracy ratings use a scale from 1% (least accurate) to 100% (most accurate). Factors include the balanced viewpoints, the presence of supporting evidence, and internal and external reliable sources.

For instance, Biasly also gave The New Indian Express a Medium Left bias rating. One The Indian Express article, titled “Energy choices guided by consumer interest: India after Trump says Modi assured halt to Russian oil”, has an Average analyst reliability rating from Biasly. The article includes multiple diverse quotes of good length, but has limited sources and doesn’t thoroughly acknowledge the opposing arguments. The author, Jaynath Jacob, had a left-leaning bias in this article. In contrast, another piece from the outlet was titled “AG grants contempt action against lawyer who hurled shoe at CJI Gavai”. It did not feature sufficient quotes or diverse sources, was rated as Somewhat Left, and scored limited for accuracy. The article does, however, maintain objectivity. Facts are presented about the issue in an organized fashion and with no personal bias visible from the author.

Below, we will take a closer look at more examples like this to analyze the reliability of The Siasat Daily’s articles. This will include its use of selection bias, omission bias, and the quality of its sources and the facts provided.

Analysis of Reliability in The Siasat Daily’s Online News Articles

The Siasat Daily aims to serve mainly people living in India with objective, fact-based reporting. Its staff includes writers from varying ideological backgrounds, most living in India. This can help balance coverage and keep the importance of its goal to be a site for Muslims in India. However, readers should distinguish between news reporting and opinion articles to evaluate credibility effectively.

One example is the article titled “After a gap of 5 years, India, China to resume direct flight services this month.” The Siasat Daily discusses the announcement from the Ministry of External Affairs. This comes after flights were suspended for multiple years due to poor India-China relations. The article refrains from editorial commentary, sticking to quotes and fact-based language. Supporting The Siasat Daily’s Somewhat Left rating, this piece illustrates factual neutrality on India-China relations.

Quality of Sources and Facts Used

The Siasat Daily generally uses credible sources from across varying viewpoints. However, some articles skew in how comprehensively they present opposing viewpoints.

Read the headline: “At least 11 more flotilla ships sailing for Gaza to break Israel blockade.” This article is supported by nonprofit data such as the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) and primary witness quotes from the situation. However, the article fails to add anything supporting the Israeli perspective. There is no reason mentioned as to why they continue the blockade or why the flotilla ships were captured. This absence creates a pro-Palestine bias, whether intended or not.

But is it possible to find evidence opposing the claim made in this article? Sakina Fatima, The Siasat Daily’s journalist, explains the reasoning for sailing into the blockade.

“Organizers say the voyages aim to highlight Gaza’s worsening humanitarian crisis, challenge restrictions on media access, and demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians.”

Concerning the method of why Israel continues to seize the humanitarian aid ships, there is nothing mentioned in the article. This lack of information gives readers the impression that there is no argument in support of Israel in this situation.

On the other hand, the article “Israel’s army says it will advance preparations for first phase of Trump’s plan ” maintains objectivity. It features information from both sides, both Israel and Hamas, regarding their stances on Trump’s peace plan. The author refrains from taking one side over the other or leaving out information. This allows readers to make their own conclusions with the article’s information.

The article gains credibility through its 6 quotes from reliable sources— 4 medium-length and 2 short. These various quotations strengthen reliability by providing solid context and minimal misrepresentation, which offers readers a more trustworthy and authentic report from primary sources. The diverse sources help reduce the possibility of a one-sided story.

The article features over eleven sources, primarily Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as statements from the Israeli army and Hamas. Additionally, data from the Gaza Health Ministry is included. While the issue is limited to the proposed peace plan and its reactions, it includes some internal diversity, as is seen in the contrast between Netanyahu’s views and Hamas’ stance on issues, along with Trump’s involvement.

• Donald Trump, President of the United States
• Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel
• Amir Avivi, retired Israeli general and chairman of Israel’s Defence and Security Forum
• Oded Ailam, a researcher at the Jerusalem Centre for Security and Foreign Affairs
• Samir Abdel-Hady, in Gaza’s Khan Younis
• Yehuda Cohen, whose son Nimrod is held in Gaza

The article accurately reflects the vast array of viewpoints from each party involved in the crisis. There are controversial statements, such as Netanyahu’s commitment to end the war and Hamas’ acceptance of some terms of Trump’s plan. But they leave room for reader interpretation. The article primarily relies on primary quotes from sources, which are highly reliable and enhance its reliability.

Selection and Omission Bias

The Siasat Daily provides coverage of India’s BJP leaders as well as their opposition, which is reasonable given the country’s political makeup. However, their bias may still emerge through framing and choice of story coverage.

In “BJP ruined healthcare system in UP, people losing faith in govt hospitals: Akilhesh”, selection bias surfaces through the article’s emphasis on negative aspects of the conservative party in India, the BJP, discussion. The article does not explore positive initiatives led by India’s BJP, nor does it present contrasting viewpoints. Still, it remains rooted in direct quotes from the opposition, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav.

The article solely highlights opposing viewpoints from Yadav. He discusses the lack of funding to hospitals despite a supposed government surplus of funding, and “destroying the state’s (Uttar Pradesh) healthcare system.” The article does not highlight any positive measures taken by the BJP in terms of healthcare and hospitals. Because of this, the article leans Somewhat Left in its framing. The issues are characterized as BJP internal issues, with no contrasting perspectives. This is because it is written from the BJP opposition’s point of view. However, the article is still grounded in verifiable quotes and facts from Yadav.

By comparison, the article republished by The Siasat Daily from the Press Trust of India shows a stronger balance. It is about India-Afghanistan bilateral trade relations and the restarting of the Kabul mission. The Press Trust of India includes quotes from leaders of both India and the Taliban in Afghanistan. A notable example of a neutral quote from an Afghan leader:

“Your visit marks an important step in advancing our ties and affirming the enduring friendship between India and Afghanistan,” Jaishankar told Muttaqi in his opening remarks at the meeting.”

The Press Trust of India uses many quotes that display diversity of opinion and leadership when brought together. The article integrated conversations from two very different leaders coming together. This is after several years apart, or since the Taliban came back to power in Afghanistan. Overall, the Press Trust of India used a well-rounded approach to delivering unbiased news to readers of The Siasat Daily.

In opinion pieces, issues with factuality, sources, selection, and omission are frequently present. The articles we’ve covered so far reflect The Siasat Daily’s Somewhat Left views, but this is not detrimental to its reliability. Its slight story selection favors issues that are more likely to concern liberals. This makes it safe to assume that sometimes it neglects issues of concern to conservatives. However, the contents of The Siasat Daily’s article maintain accuracy and cite evidence and quotations from numerous and varied sources.

So, Is The Siasat Daily Reliable?

Overall, The Siasat Daily can be considered to be an outlet that is minimally reliable. It demonstrates a consistent goal of journalistic integrity and typically supports claims with sources and quotes. Occasional omissions and framing bias do appear, particularly on culturally sensitive or partisan issues.

As media literacy improves, readers can more easily detect issues with selection bias, omission bias, and factuality. To strengthen your ability to assess reliability across the political spectrum, use the News Bias Checker to compare how multiple outlets report the same story.

This empowers you to consume more accurate, balanced, and dependable news.

Who Funds The Siasat Daily?

The Siasat Daily is funded through a combination of print sales, digital readership, and limited advertising, with the publication historically operating with relatively modest profit motives. Media observers note that it has relied less on commercial advertisements than many mainstream outlets, which allows its editorial decisions to prioritize community-focused reporting rather than revenue-driven content. Its long-standing readership base also contributes to sustaining operations without aggressive monetization.

Because The Siasat Daily is closely tied to the local community it serves, its funding model can influence the topics it chooses to emphasize or the perspectives it highlights, particularly on issues affecting Muslim communities in Hyderabad. While this structure reduces the pressures that come with large corporate ownership, readers should be aware that a newsroom supported mainly by its core audience may at times reflect the concerns or viewpoints of that audience more prominently than others.

Related Tools and Resource Pages

To better understand how The Siasat Daily fits into the broader media landscape, we recommend exploring these helpful resources:

• Media Bias Chart: See where The Siasat Daily ranks compared to hundreds of media outlets across the entire political spectrum.
• Political Bias Chart: Visualize political slants of news sources across various policy areas.
• Journalist Bias Analytics Platform: Explore how individual journalists contribute to bias within their publications.
• Politician Bias Analytics Platform: Compare how politicians are framed differently by The Siasat Daily and other outlets.
• Media Literacy Education Platform: Learn how to critically assess media sources, bias techniques, and news reliability scores.