Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action at Colleges and Universities

Jun 30, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -58% Very Liberal

  • Reliability

    75% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    -58% Very Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    30% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday on two landmark cases challenging affirmative action in higher education, ending decades of expanded access to college education for students of color and overturning decades of precedent."
Positive
26% Conservative
"In fact, Harvard University was cited by Justice Lewis Powell as the model for affirmative action in the 1978 case establishing the constitutionality of race-based admissions, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."
Positive
24% Conservative
"The Harvard economist determined that the class would have been 9"
Positive
10% Conservative
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

63% : The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday on two landmark cases challenging affirmative action in higher education, ending decades of expanded access to college education for students of color and overturning decades of precedent.
62% : In fact, Harvard University was cited by Justice Lewis Powell as the model for affirmative action in the 1978 case establishing the constitutionality of race-based admissions, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.
55% : The Harvard economist determined that the class would have been 9% Hispanic rather than 13%, and 6% Black as opposed to 14% under affirmative action.
53% : Though Harvard is private, it receives federal funding for a variety of programs and thus is covered by federal anti-discrimination laws.
50% : The hostility of this court toward affirmative action was made clear in the oral arguments last fall.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link