The Bizarre -- and Hypothetical -- Case That Sparked the Supreme Court's Regressive LGBTQ+ Discrimination Ruling

View Original Article
Published Jun 30, 2023
Reliability
Help
Biasly's Reliability Score provides a rating of the quality of sources and quotes used in the article including their uniqueness and diversity. Grades are computed on a scale from A to F with A being an Excellent Reliability.
Grade C50% Reliable
Bias Rating
Help
The Bias Rating is computed based on a number of factors including bias loaded words, sentiments towards certain political policies, author bias towards politicians, and the amount of tone found in the article.

10% Center

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter Img

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Policy Leaning
Help
The policy leaning score is derived from author biases for or against a certain political policy, as found in articles.

10% Center

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter Img

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Politician Portrayal
Help
The politician leaning score is determined by the author's tone and leaning towards the specific politician mentioned in the article.

N/A

Opposite Viewpoint
Category

Reliability Score Analysis

The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.

  • Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
  • Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
  • Multiple Sources as Good for a higher number of total sources.
  • Multiple Quotes as Excellent for a very high number of quotes used in the article.
  • Quote Length as Fair for an average number of words used in each quote.

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.


Policy Leaning Analysis

This article includes the following sentiments, providing an average bias score of 10% Conservative:

  • 2 negative sentiments for LGBT Equality
  • 2 negative sentiments for Anti-Discrimination Laws
  • 1 negative sentiment for Abortion
  • 1 negative sentiment for Public Education Spending


Policies:

Public Education Spending
Abortion
Anti-Discrimination Laws
LGBT Equality

Sentiments

  •   Conservative
0% "But this week -- when The New Republic got ahold of the Stewart whose name, email address, and cell phone number were included on ..."
-10% "On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow a Christian web designer to refuse her services to LGBTQ+ people, a historic decision that ..."
-14% "Smith has been represented by attorneys for the Christian rights group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which lobbies to expand Christian practices within public schools ..."
-16% "Still, Smith filed suit in Colorado in an attempt to block the enforcement of its anti-discrimination law, arguing that when she does begin designing ..."
-22% "Because she had not yet been confronted with a gay couple requesting her services -- or broken the anti-discrimination law -- the state sought ..."
-30% "Smith's lawsuit was built largely around a hypothetical scenario, in that she had not actually designed any wedding websites or tried to turn away ..."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter Img

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : But this week -- when The New Republic got ahold of the Stewart whose name, email address, and cell phone number were included on that "same-sex marriage request" -- the man told the outlet he did not send the form, and that he was married to a woman at the time it was allegedly sent.
45% : On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow a Christian web designer to refuse her services to LGBTQ+ people, a historic decision that walks back hard-fought human rights battles and paves the way for businesses to legally discriminate based on a person's sexual orientation or gender identity.
43% : Smith has been represented by attorneys for the Christian rights group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which lobbies to expand Christian practices within public schools and in government, and to outlaw abortion.
42% : Still, Smith filed suit in Colorado in an attempt to block the enforcement of its anti-discrimination law, arguing that when she does begin designing wedding websites, she should not be forced to design them for LGBTQ+ clients, because creating messaging that she disapproves of would oppose her religious beliefs and potentially violate her right to free speech.
39% : Because she had not yet been confronted with a gay couple requesting her services -- or broken the anti-discrimination law -- the state sought to dismiss her case.
35% : Smith's lawsuit was built largely around a hypothetical scenario, in that she had not actually designed any wedding websites or tried to turn away same-sex couples when she sued.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link