Tlaib wants Border Patrol to address allegations of discrimination, racial profiling in Michigan
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-24% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : The ACLU report is based on thousands of U.S. Customs and Border Protection records and daily logs from 2012 to 2019.51% : The report found 85% of non-citizens detained by CBP were of Latin American descent, even though more than 70% of people arrested in the state attempting to enter the U.S. from Canada were either Canadian citizens or originally from Europe.
50% : According to the report, speaking Spanish or another foreign language was a basis for 19% of Border Patrol stops.
40% : Ninety-six percent of people detained or arrested by Border Patrol in Michigan are not white.
39% : One-third of people stopped by CBP from 2012-19 are legal U.S. citizens, according to the ACLU report.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.