While it is absolutely terrible that a handful of young republicans have been participating in a chat that uses derogatory language against minority and racial groups and praises extreme radicalism. I found it concerning that this report, along with many other articles about this report, are using partisan language and buzzwords when getting their point across. As in example, the article uses phrases like "vile racist and anti-Semetic rhetoric" that are filled with buzzwords to describe the derogatory nature of the text messages instead of using language that was more standardized and neutral. Additionally, the article often used partisan, politically charged, and emotionally charged language. One examples is the "Trump-era loosening of political norms". This phrase implies that under President Trump, speaking inappropriately about someone has become more normalized or socially acceptable. This type of language can be seen as reflecting a left-leaning bias (to some extent) because it frames the behaviors and rhetoric of these Young Republicans as not only morally disgraceful but also a symptom of a broader, negative transformation associated with right-wing politics under Trump. While I am thankful that these actions have been brought to light, I wish the report was written to reflect a more center-leaning position.