Daily Report
This Woman Was Just Sent To Prison For Posting A Mean Tweet
Why Troubling News:
The first thing I assumed about this article is that the author is talking about an American woman whose rights could have potentially been violated. This is a normal assumption because this is an American news source. However, the article is actually about a UK woman and the UK justice system. The title is misleading, seemingly designed to attract clicks from people assuming it concerns the US. The contents of the article are also extremely biased and filled with false information.
Warning: Undefined variable $poll_id in /home/runcloud/webapps/biasly/wp-content/themes/child-them/single-reports.php on line 956
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I’ve been seeing an uptick in this tactic lately, especially around free speech. It seems as though various political leaders in the United States have recently made several remarks on censorship in …Read MoreI’ve been seeing an uptick in this tactic lately, especially around free speech. It seems as though various political leaders in the United States have recently made several remarks on censorship in the EU and Europe as a whole, particularly as it relates to endangering free speech within the US. Given that this issue may be a budding hot topic, I am not surprised that media outlets have started capitalizing on it. Read Less
I wouldnt call the title “full-blown misinformation” however it would have been better if the title highlighted that this was a UK case, as it may cause people who simply look at titles or quickly …Read MoreI wouldnt call the title “full-blown misinformation” however it would have been better if the title highlighted that this was a UK case, as it may cause people who simply look at titles or quickly skim through articles to believe that this might have occured in the US, which isnt the case. I also agree that there is some misleading information throghout the article. Read Less
I believe the title is more misleading and that only fuels the misinformation within the article. But I agree that the title is technically true.