X Challenges California Law on Content Moderation Disclosure in New Lawsuit
- Bias Rating
-20% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-24% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
12% Positive
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"One year ago, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 587 into law, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in understanding how these platforms influence public discourse and shape the content we encounter on social media daily." | Positive | 18% Conservative |
"He emphasized that the law does not impose specific content moderation policies but rather mandates companies to openly disclose their content moderation approaches." | Positive | 0% Conservative |
"They argue that AB 587 seems designed to pressure companies like X Corp. into removing, demonetizing, or deprioritizing content protected by the Constitution.X asserts that the true intent of the law is to compel social media platforms to eliminate specific constitutionally-protected content deemed problematic by the State." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
"One year ago, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 587 into law, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in understanding how these platforms influence public discourse and shape the content we encounter on social media daily." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
"Also Read: California Takes Initiative to Examine Risks, Benefits of Generative AIIn response to the legal action, Jesse Gabriel, the California Assemblymember who authored the bill, stated that AB 587 is solely aimed at promoting transparency." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
"It's important to consider that Gabriel represents a government that, for various reasons we won't delve into here, routinely engages in intrusions into private data, albeit on a personal level." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : One year ago, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 587 into law, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in understanding how these platforms influence public discourse and shape the content we encounter on social media daily.50% : He emphasized that the law does not impose specific content moderation policies but rather mandates companies to openly disclose their content moderation approaches.
43% : They argue that AB 587 seems designed to pressure companies like X Corp. into removing, demonetizing, or deprioritizing content protected by the Constitution.X asserts that the true intent of the law is to compel social media platforms to eliminate specific constitutionally-protected content deemed problematic by the State.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.