Pinkerton: What JD Vance's Federal Land Bonanza Means for the 50 States
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
12% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-10% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
20% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Referring to oil, Trump said at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, "We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far.43% : As Trump says, "Make America Rich Again." Needless to say, not every state will want this: Some will bow down to the green gods, prostrating their economy on the altar of eco-austerity.
40% : If Donald Trump and JD Vance win this November, that will be literally a true statement because Trump and Vance want to use federal land to create more housing and wealth for Americans.
40% : (Even the Federal Emergency Management Administration got into the act; FEMA has nothing better to do, eh?) Trump has also called for using federal lands to support a "a new American industrialism."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.