Birthright citizenship case at Supreme Court reveals deeper questions about judicial authority to halt unlawful policies

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : " Another way to address the concerns about a single judge blocking government action would be to require a three-judge panel to hear cases involving nationwide injunctions, requiring at least two of them to agree.
47% : In March 2025, Trump ordered government lawyers to demand large cash deposits - called "security bonds" - from anyone seeking an injunction.
45% : Take DACA, the common name for the program formally called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which protects about 500,000 young immigrants from deportation.
28% : That's because, when President Barack Obama created DACA in 2012 and sought to expand it via executive order in 2015, a Texas judge blocked the expansion with a nationwide injunction.
8% : When Trump tried to end DACA, judges in California, New York and Washington, D.C. blocked that move.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.