Trump Sure Looks to Be Pursuing Regime Change in Venezuela | National Review

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : Attacks on Venezuelan territory would give additional salience to these claims and threaten to fuel anti-American sentiment at a time in which the United States sees Latin America as a critical ground for its competition with China.
55% : At the end of September, the Times reported that Secretary of State (and Acting National Security Adviser, and Acting National Archivist of the U.S., and former Acting Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, and . . .)
50% : it sure looks like Trump is pursuing a policy of regime change in Venezuela.
50% : Trump Sends the CIA Against Venezuela's Maduro I guess the CIA's ongoing work in Venezuela isn't so covert anymore.
50% : And you thought I was joking when I said Trump was the greatest neoconservative president we've had in ages.
50% : It appears they have persuaded the president; in late October, Trump instructed special presidential envoy Richard Grenell to stop diplomatic discussions with the regime in Venezuela.
50% : Remember, one of the reasons the U.S. is spending $20 billion to purchase Argentinian pesos, and organizing the arrival of another $20 billion from non-government sources, is because we don't want Argentina to fall under China's sway.
42% : The United States has a long history of military intervention in Latin America, which still resonates throughout the region.
35% : After years of economic failure, spiking crime, and political oppression that caused a quarter of the population to flee, exhausted voters turned out in droves to reject the brutal dictator Nicolás Maduro, despite his crude efforts to intimidate them and discredit the opposition.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.