
Lazy and fraudulent: we saw the true Johnson at the Covid inquiry - and why his like must never have power again | Martin Kettle
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-68% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
9% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
72% : Indifference, skilfully translated into policy and action, was an essential driver of his 14-year presidency.61% : Michael Gove told the inquiry last week that Johnson liked to listen to contending arguments about courses of action before coming to a decision.
59% : He combines indifference to principles and disregard for others with disorganisation of mind and behaviour, and indecisiveness and laziness in action.
57% : He famously wobbled about which side to take on Brexit.
56% : Seeing him in action once again, and with more to come on Thursday, it is the reckless incompetence and manifest unsuitability that stand out most.
43% : If that is his blessing, his curse is that, unlike Mitterrand, he could not then turn it into effective government action.
43% : Keith led Johnson through the crucial days in mid-March, when the argument inside government moved more decisively towards lockdown - a moment at which, according to Matt Hancock last week, 30,000 otherwise lost lives could have been saved by an earlier imposition.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.