A Justice Department Show of Force in the Mar-a-Lago Case

Sep 01, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -2% Center

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
"He argues that the search warrant was overbroad in allowing the seizure of personal effects located alongside presidential records, boldly accuses the government of violating the Presidential Records Act by ignoring his statutory rights to control his own presidential records, suggests that these deficiencies warrant suppression of any seized evidence under the Fourth Amendment, and closes with the telling assertion that the government has long treated President Donald J. Trump unfairly."
Positive
10% Conservative
"The Justice Department's filing Tuesday evening in former President Trump's federal court effort to slow the Mar-a-Lago investigation presents a remarkable show of strength and confidence in the ongoing probe."
Positive
28% Conservative
"When the bureau arrived to pick up those documents on June 3, Trump's custodian of records -- uamed in the filing, but reported by the New York Times to have been Trump lawyer Christina Bobb -- provided a signed letter stating thata. A diligent search was conducted of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Florida; b."
Positive
14% Conservative
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : He argues that the search warrant was overbroad in allowing the seizure of personal effects located alongside presidential records, boldly accuses the government of violating the Presidential Records Act by ignoring his statutory rights to control his own presidential records, suggests that these deficiencies warrant suppression of any seized evidence under the Fourth Amendment, and closes with the telling assertion that "the government has long treated President Donald J. Trump unfairly."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link