CNBC Article Rating

Foreign election influence campaigns have bark but questionable bite

  • Bias Rating

    -6% Center

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    4% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -58% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

40% : The Office of the Director National Intelligence's Foreign Malign Influence Center, the U.S. intelligence community's dedicated group for countering foreign propaganda aimed at the election, has maintained that election manipulation efforts are ongoing and that each country has clear goals: Russia aims to support Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris, Iran aims to hurt Trump's candidacy, and China has decided not to use its existing propaganda apparatus to promote one U.S. presidential candidate over the other, though experts say it is perpetually interested in undermining U.S. support for democracy.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link