Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
I believe all countries need to be on the same page on this particular issue as it becomes more of a moral issue than a scientific one.
I am not sure if there needs to be global agreement on the use of gene editing technologies. I think the issue would certainly produced mix opinions and so I am not exactly sure how something like …Read MoreI am not sure if there needs to be global agreement on the use of gene editing technologies. I think the issue would certainly produced mix opinions and so I am not exactly sure how something like this could work to reach a global agreement. Read Less
Having an international agreement on a technology that could negatively alter society is important. It is technology that can be both beneficial yet used for the wrong reasons.
This issue is too important for countries to not be on the same page about. Whether that is agreeing or disagreeing, they should be on the same page because issues like this going left is dangerous in …Read MoreThis issue is too important for countries to not be on the same page about. Whether that is agreeing or disagreeing, they should be on the same page because issues like this going left is dangerous in my opinion. Read Less
I think gene editing technologies are extremely dangerous ad hence there needs to be control, agreement, and accountability to ue these technologies responsibly.