Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
Nope. On the contrary, I think governments should sign an agreement to not destroy habitats in other planets. Plus, I think funding those types of initiatives will cause citizens to complain. Those …Read MoreNope. On the contrary, I think governments should sign an agreement to not destroy habitats in other planets. Plus, I think funding those types of initiatives will cause citizens to complain. Those funds would be better used to improve people’s lives in this planet. Read Less
I believe that governments should focus funding here because colonization of other plants is not likely to happen in the near future. Further, the likelihood that people would be interested in living …Read MoreI believe that governments should focus funding here because colonization of other plants is not likely to happen in the near future. Further, the likelihood that people would be interested in living on another planet is so low that utilizing funds to benefit people in their countries should be the priority of governments. That said, legitimate advancement of scientific knowledge should continue. Read Less
I think that it could be a waste of money because it is not likely that it will actually happen. If it does, it would be very costly.