Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
Yes, I think there should be some agreement on the usage of military drones to limit the number of international disagreements.
Maybe, there should be research done to see its effects on overall lives lost, and depending on the results an agreement should be made.
Yes, there should be an international agreement to limit proliferation of autonomous military drones, in my opinion. Because drones have benefits but also disadvantages in many ways.
Maybe. It may benefit to have certain rules to protect innocent lives during drone strikes.
Yes, drones have caused a lot of civilian damage in the past, so we should take measures to work against their proliferation and potential for mass destruction.
Such an agreement would not receive many signatories.
It is a complicated issue – but I think the main reason an agreement is not applicable is that it would not get many signatures.
I think that the answer depends on the whether the usage of these drones is netting a positive or negative outcome. Even if they are netting a positive outcome, it is worthwhile to consider what the …Read MoreI think that the answer depends on the whether the usage of these drones is netting a positive or negative outcome. Even if they are netting a positive outcome, it is worthwhile to consider what the negative aspects may be of using such technology in such capacities. Read Less
I think this depends on the regulation of other military weapons and the impact it has on people.