Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
Yes, for the sake of the environment this seems necessary.
I think this would be a good way to institutionally change environmental policy and work towards improving the environment. However, I do think there are many challenges and costs that come with this …Read MoreI think this would be a good way to institutionally change environmental policy and work towards improving the environment. However, I do think there are many challenges and costs that come with this however once in place would be greatly beneficial. Read Less
Yes, this is important for the environment and taking care of the climate change.
Absolutely; I don’t think anyone wants a repeat of the environmental effects/haze of LA in the 50s and 60s, and anyone who spends a significant amount of time in urban areas knows how hot they can; …Read MoreAbsolutely; I don’t think anyone wants a repeat of the environmental effects/haze of LA in the 50s and 60s, and anyone who spends a significant amount of time in urban areas knows how hot they can get; anything to reduce the impact of climate change in these areas is critical, in my view. Read Less