IMMUNITY | Armstrong Economics

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : Special Prosecutor has Charged Trump with CONSPIRACY, which is simply an agreement - not the substantive crime of insurrection.
42% : The apparently unbroken historical tradition supports the view, which I think implicit in the separation of powers established by the Constitution, that the principals in whom the executive and legislative powers are ultimately vested-viz., the President and the Congress (as opposed to their agents)-may not be ordered to perform particular executive or legislative acts at the behest of the Judiciary.2'' Two vice presidents have been indicted: Aaron Burr in New York and New Jersey for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel at Weehawken, New Jersey on July 11, 1804, and Spiro Agnew, who pleaded no contest to several offenses at the moment of his resignation.
40% : They have charged Trump with what someone could charge all of these prosecutors for interfering in the 2024 election.
29% : The Washington Appellate Court claimed that Trump was acting not as the President but as a candidate.
26% : If you have ABSOLUTE immunity for Special Prosecutor Smith and judges regardless of their actions, then how can you deny IMMUNITY for Trump?
10% : This questionable judge, in trying to destroy Donald Trump, wrote in the ruling: "In arguing that he is entitled to official-act immunity in the cases before us, President Trump does not dispute that he engaged in his alleged actions up to and on January 6 in his capacity as a candidate.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.