ABC 'Mistakenly' Releases Tuesday's Election Results for Pennsylvania: Harris 52%, Trump 47%
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
5% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : The U.S. government has a vested interest in making its elections fair and transparent because if Americans decide that democracy isn't a viable means to pursue political change, they're likely to pursue non-democratic tactics.47% : So, if this pre-election test was optimized by ABC for accuracy, you'd expect its numbers to err on the side of Trump.
41% : According to the latest polls, Trump has a narrow lead in Pennsylvania.
33% : From ABC moderators rigging presidential debates to phantom numbers "accidentally" declaring Harris the winner, the greatest threat to our democracy has nothing to do with Trump.
22% : After aggressively "fact checking" Trump and turning a blind eye to Kamala's multiple fabrications, their track record of bias makes it difficult to accept their explanation at face value.
2% : " ABC News, of course, was widely criticized by conservatives for transforming its Sept. 10 presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris into a three-on-one, WWE-style handicap match, with "unbiased" moderators David Muir and Linsey David attacking Trump and assisting Harris.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.